Comments for us-first.us Blog http://us-first.us/blog We The People want our government to behave like when these United States were founded -- when our interests were first. Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:45:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 Comment on “Hey Calderon…Go To Hell, I’m Goin’ Home!” by Administrator http://us-first.us/blog/2007/03/14/hey-calderongo-to-hell-im-goin-home/comment-page-1/#comment-136 Administrator Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:45:51 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2007/03/14/hey-calderongo-to-hell-im-goin-home/#comment-136 Had you only insulted me, I would not have accepted your comments -- but you also made some valid points, so I accepted them in their entirety.  I always post non-spam as-received (and bit-bucket spam). Before I tell you where I agree, I will ask you if the doors (and windows) on your house or apartment have locks? Do you have any electronic security equipment installed and in use?  A fence around the yard?  Do you live in a gated community? Why? May I come and take whatever I want, when I want -- without first getting your approval? Why not?  is your stuff just for you and those with whom you choose to share? I am a third-generation American. I suspect that my ancestors did not all come here "by the book". Two wrongs do not make a right. I am pro-immigration -- that is, in fact, what my dealings in Ukraine that I mention in other postiings are about. I am, however, against illegal immigration -- and their exploitation by thugs and cheap-skates in this country. That we as a people have put price above ethics is a sign of how far we have fallen from our glory days. Do you not believe that Mexico's problems, which make their people want to come here, are the result of corruption at all levels of their government -- much more than we have here? We do have corruption here, but it's still much less here than in many places.  Our laws against it still, by and large, get enforced.  I do not blame the person risking life and limb and often paying great sums of money to thugs to come here -- I would, too.  I blame those in power -- also thugs.  That is why I suggested that our president not stand for a lecture from their president -- especially when he appears to be on their side! I don't know if you are being tongue-in-cheek when you say that the US gets a "great benefit" from "cheap labor free of responsibilities" -- I hope you are.  What benefit can there be to our acting immorally? Had you only insulted me, I would not have accepted your comments — but you also made some valid points, so I accepted them in their entirety.  I always post non-spam as-received (and bit-bucket spam).

Before I tell you where I agree, I will ask you if the doors (and windows) on your house or apartment have locks? Do you have any electronic security equipment installed and in use?  A fence around the yard?  Do you live in a gated community? Why? May I come and take whatever I want, when I want — without first getting your approval? Why not?  is your stuff just for you and those with whom you choose to share?

I am a third-generation American. I suspect that my ancestors did not all come here “by the book”. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am pro-immigration — that is, in fact, what my dealings in Ukraine that I mention in other postiings are about. I am, however, against illegal immigration — and their exploitation by thugs and cheap-skates in this country. That we as a people have put price above ethics is a sign of how far we have fallen from our glory days.

Do you not believe that Mexico’s problems, which make their people want to come here, are the result of corruption at all levels of their government — much more than we have here? We do have corruption here, but it’s still much less here than in many places.  Our laws against it still, by and large, get enforced.  I do not blame the person risking life and limb and often paying great sums of money to thugs to come here — I would, too.  I blame those in power — also thugs.  That is why I suggested that our president not stand for a lecture from their president — especially when he appears to be on their side!

I don’t know if you are being tongue-in-cheek when you say that the US gets a “great benefit” from “cheap labor free of responsibilities” — I hope you are.  What benefit can there be to our acting immorally?

]]>
Comment on “Hey Calderon…Go To Hell, I’m Goin’ Home!” by John D Clinton http://us-first.us/blog/2007/03/14/hey-calderongo-to-hell-im-goin-home/comment-page-1/#comment-134 John D Clinton Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:39:51 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2007/03/14/hey-calderongo-to-hell-im-goin-home/#comment-134 I consider your message the result of an extreme critical situation in our country. I don't really blame you, as I understand ignorance has reached horrible levels in our country. I don't know if you have ever left your suburb to see what is out there in the world. The world doesn't like our country because of our flamboyant president and people like you thinking that the world is for us and our country is only for us. Unless you are Indian American, you probably have immigrant ancestors, and most likely they didn't come in a fancy yacht. They probably came running away from starvation or persecution. Hunger was the main driver during those years, now it is ignorance. Go out, see what other countries have achieved and why U.S. should be consider a good country and not the invader... Don't blame Mexicans for coming to work here. They are here because they don't have jobs in Mexico and because our country like to have cheap labor free of responsibilities. Both U.S. and Mexico are contributing to this situation. U.S. gets a great benefit from it: you can have your house fixed and your fruits and vegetables ready at dinner time... immigrants contribute a whole to the gdp of our country. Don't be fascist. Your example about the wall is bad in any way. Every wall is to keep sets separated, that's wrong from the first conception of it. I'll be glad to hear your comments. I consider your message the result of an extreme critical situation in our country. I don’t really blame you, as I understand ignorance has reached horrible levels in our country. I don’t know if you have ever left your suburb to see what is out there in the world. The world doesn’t like our country because of our flamboyant president and people like you thinking that the world is for us and our country is only for us. Unless you are Indian American, you probably have immigrant ancestors, and most likely they didn’t come in a fancy yacht. They probably came running away from starvation or persecution. Hunger was the main driver during those years, now it is ignorance. Go out, see what other countries have achieved and why U.S. should be consider a good country and not the invader… Don’t blame Mexicans for coming to work here. They are here because they don’t have jobs in Mexico and because our country like to have cheap labor free of responsibilities. Both U.S. and Mexico are contributing to this situation. U.S. gets a great benefit from it: you can have your house fixed and your fruits and vegetables ready at dinner time… immigrants contribute a whole to the gdp of our country. Don’t be fascist. Your example about the wall is bad in any way. Every wall is to keep sets separated, that’s wrong from the first conception of it.

I’ll be glad to hear your comments.

]]>
Comment on Are US Laws Too Tough On Crime? by Administrator http://us-first.us/blog/2006/12/10/are-us-laws-too-tough-on-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Administrator Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:56:00 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2006/12/10/are-us-laws-too-tough-on-crime/#comment-10 That may be true. Regardless of the source, the observation is still an accurate one. That may be true. Regardless of the source, the observation is still an accurate one.

]]>
Comment on Are US Laws Too Tough On Crime? by John J. Pitney, Jr. http://us-first.us/blog/2006/12/10/are-us-laws-too-tough-on-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-9 John J. Pitney, Jr. Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:48:31 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2006/12/10/are-us-laws-too-tough-on-crime/#comment-9 Sorry, the Tocqueville quotation is spurious. See: http://www.tocqueville.org/pitney.htm Sorry, the Tocqueville quotation is spurious. See: http://www.tocqueville.org/pitney.htm

]]>
Comment on UN-American by Administrator http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/20/un-american/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Administrator Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:12:19 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/20/un-american/#comment-7 So, Charlie Rangel and Nancy Pelosi have issued some remarks against Franken-Chavez calling our President names while on our soil. I also heard that Hilary Clinton issued a statement against Iran's Amabama-whack-job's tyrade against us at the UN. I haven't heard of any Republicans stepping up to the plate... I don't care what their reasons were for making their remarks -- when you're right, you're right. I don't agree with much else of what they say. And, why was Franken-Chavez running around New York outside of the UN compound? So, Charlie Rangel and Nancy Pelosi have issued some remarks against Franken-Chavez calling our President names while on our soil. I also heard that Hilary Clinton issued a statement against Iran’s Amabama-whack-job’s tyrade against us at the UN. I haven’t heard of any Republicans stepping up to the plate… I don’t care what their reasons were for making their remarks — when you’re right, you’re right. I don’t agree with much else of what they say.

And, why was Franken-Chavez running around New York outside of the UN compound?

]]>
Comment on UN-American by Administrator http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/20/un-american/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Administrator Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:29:49 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/20/un-american/#comment-6 Add to this the puny, little Chavez from Venezuela. Yet another reason to get the UN the hell out of here. Bush is no angel; but, where are those in public life -- the media included -- to tell Chavez to shut the hell up? Tell him that we may belittle our own leaders -- but you don't come over here and call him (or any Democrat) the devil. Chavez, you bastard -- stay home and do your trask-talking from underneath your rock. Add to this the puny, little Chavez from Venezuela. Yet another reason to get the UN the hell out of here. Bush is no angel; but, where are those in public life — the media included — to tell Chavez to shut the hell up? Tell him that we may belittle our own leaders — but you don’t come over here and call him (or any Democrat) the devil. Chavez, you bastard — stay home and do your trask-talking from underneath your rock.

]]>
Comment on The Pope’s Remarks by Administrator http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/16/the-popes-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Administrator Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:30:39 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/16/the-popes-remarks/#comment-4 Thanks for the welcome, Mark. The question we have to ask is not which side God is on, but which side are we on. I submit to you the Hutus and the Tootsies battling it out in Rwanda 10 years ago.  I'd think it was pretty hard for God to choose sides in that one -- if he did at all.  Ye shall know them by their fruit... Thanks for the welcome, Mark. The question we have to ask is not which side God is on, but which side are we on. I submit to you the Hutus and the Tootsies battling it out in Rwanda 10 years ago.  I’d think it was pretty hard for God to choose sides in that one — if he did at all.  Ye shall know them by their fruit…

]]>
Comment on The Pope’s Remarks by Mark http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/16/the-popes-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Mark Sat, 16 Sep 2006 13:35:12 +0000 http://us-first.us/blog/2006/09/16/the-popes-remarks/#comment-3 Dean, Firstly, thanks for digging my Blog out of the masses and stopping by... Now, I have one thought, on this specific topic. Regardless of my personal faith, I do not advocate the cowardly shooting of three month olds from behind, in the neck, to "further" my religion's sect. I don't believe that a "real" Islamic does either. This "spewage" about the Pope - is just spewage. It became obvious in France and from the cartoons, that they will use any excuse to promote their fanaticism - it truly has nothing to do with "faith." The fact that someone is a Christian/Buddhist/Muslim etc., means nothing when you go directly to the heart of any human being who has the simplest of understandings of the reality of God. God is Love. God doesn't fly planes into buildings killing innocent people. God doesn't shoot 3 month old babies in the back. Neither does the Pope, but they'll make the lame attempt to spin it that way. Here's the thought - in a war between Christians and Islam, between followers of Christ or Muhammed, venture a guess where God's allegiance might lie. Yeah - that's what I thought too... Welcome to the Blogosphere! Mark Dean,

Firstly, thanks for digging my Blog out of the masses and stopping by…

Now, I have one thought, on this specific topic. Regardless of my personal faith, I do not advocate the cowardly shooting of three month olds from behind, in the neck, to “further” my religion’s sect. I don’t believe that a “real” Islamic does either.

This “spewage” about the Pope – is just spewage. It became obvious in France and from the cartoons, that they will use any excuse to promote their fanaticism – it truly has nothing to do with “faith.”

The fact that someone is a Christian/Buddhist/Muslim etc., means nothing when you go directly to the heart of any human being who has the simplest of understandings of the reality of God. God is Love. God doesn’t fly planes into buildings killing innocent people. God doesn’t shoot 3 month old babies in the back.

Neither does the Pope, but they’ll make the lame attempt to spin it that way.

Here’s the thought – in a war between Christians and Islam, between followers of Christ or Muhammed, venture a guess where God’s allegiance might lie.

Yeah – that’s what I thought too…

Welcome to the Blogosphere!

Mark

]]>